Skip to main content

Blog 7: Citizen Action on Health Care

               In the New York Times article, Citizen Action on Healthcare, opinion writer David Leonhardt describes the process of the Senate to "repealing the healthcare bill."  First, he elaborates on the repercussions of revoking the current system of healthcare. According to Leonhardt, "20 million Americans" could potentially lose their healthcare, and some citizens may not exhibit the best quality care. He also emphasizes that health care insurance companies could "deteriorate" as a result. After covering the details of the effects of the loss of Obamacare, Leonhardt negatively portrays the process of removing Obamacare by Republican senators. Leonhardt expresses the repeal process by stating that senators vote to enact a repeal or to keep the current healthcare. To show his personal bias on Obamacare, Leonhardt discusses that Republican senators are not revealing all of the matters to repealing healthcare. The meetings, discussions, hearings of Republican senators are not apparent.
             To initiate his credibility, Leonhardt suggests ways that Democratic senators and citizens can become involved in helping to keep Obamacare relevant in America's healthcare. He urges citizens to portray their emotions and perspectives on the actions of the Republican senators. He also suggests Democratic senators, who are currently close to the ongoing process, to voice their opinion through 'filibustering" and voting. 
              Although I personally agree with Leonhardt's efforts to persuade Democratic citizens to emphasize their opinions through free speech, I disagree with the format of his commentary. He provides a limited and narrow opinion of Obamacare. As a citizen looking to see opinions from across the board, I would find it more beneficial if Leonhardt highlighted the actions that would unfold if Obamacare was a still prevalent in today's society. The long term effects of both choices to either repeal or keep the current system constant would be helpful to understand the results overall. He managed to state the effects of repealing Obamacare, but never his personal beliefs about what Obamacare has done to improve the life of citizens. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog 6: Comment on Emily's Post About Filter Bubbles

     Emily, I agree with your critique about Eli Pariser's TED talk. Filter bubbles are not allowing Internet users to be exposed to a large variety of opinions and perspectives. There is a plethora of political news articles available to users across the country, but the "algorithm" that you mentioned prevents citizens from learning new perspectives about politics. If some citizens in communities don't have the personal resources to learn about our United States government through family or community, the Internet may be their only resource of political knowledge. If the search engines of Internet sites eliminate political news from articles and editorials that have all different political ideologies, then they may not retrieve the knowledge they need to formulate their own opinions about public policy and other social issues. As a result, citizens do not have enough political knowledge to vote and become politically engaged.             I...
Post a Comment
Read more

Blog 2: Right and Left on the Future of the Health Care Bill

In the article, Right and Left on the Future of the Senate Health Care Bill , the author showcases opinionated responses from conservatives, liberals, and those having political biases from both sides regarding American health care insurance. On the more conservative side, conservative citizens discuss their opinions on how health care insurance does not lead to the ultimate care of citizens. One conservative expressed his opinion about his belief that the federal government should not control the health care system. On the other hand, liberals emphasize their opinion that the bill may leave more citizens ultimately uninsured. Others express the idea that a large policy change needs to occur in order to address the healthcare issue at hand. Overall, author, Anna Dubenko uses opnions from multiple political perspectives to convey the ideologies of America on the Health Care Bill. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/11/us/politics/right-and-left-on-the-future-of-the-senate-health-...
Post a Comment
Read more

Blog 5: Censorship: It's Always for Your Own Good

              In a Commentary published by the National Review , author David Harsanyi expresses his conservative and somewhat narrow minded opinions about censorship in the United States. Harsanyi argues that the freedom of speech guaranteed by the first amendment is a principle that should be apparent within our society, because citizens should be able to express their views and perspectives. To highlight his anger and passion towards ensuring the right to free speech, Harsanyi describes British Laws. He vocalizes the beliefs of "U.K.'s Committee of Advertising Practice," by discussing their view that "commercials in which family members are portrayed" show harmful traditional gender roles and that women should be protected from these stereotypes evident in the media realm of the world. Harsanyi used the information from other countries to portray his thoughts and feeling about the particular issue relevant within the Un...
Post a Comment
Read more